The Leading Source

January 21, 2010

Making foreign language a top priority, merely lip service in U.S. schools

logo_wyySigh. There is something inherently disappointing in the tendency of American policymakers to talk about what needs to be done—and then fail to do it.

Latest case in point: We all know of the need to teach more students a foreign language before they enter tomorrow’s global economy. Yet, over the past decade, thousands of public schools have dropped all instruction in French, Spanish, and other languages.

So reports a study released by the Center for Applied Linguistics, which surveyed 5,000 public and private schools about their foreign language instruction. The study, conducted in collaboration with the research group Westat, was funded by the U.S. Department of Education.

A closer look at the report reveals that the decline in foreign language classes hasn’t occurred at the high school, where officials are heedful of state mandates and the coursework students need to enter college.

No, the dramatic cuts are at the elementary and middle school, where foreign language educators have long argued is where instruction should begin—and must begin if more students are to truly master a language during their school years.
(more…)

June 22, 2009

School Board News Today headlines

Should schools cut animal dissections?

Duncan warns advocates that inferior charter schools harm the effort

Two students, two schools — 20 miles and a world apart

Delaware bill would reward 10 schools for closing gap

Philadelphia teachers cite intense push to promote

Calif. Democrats want schools to get billions that voters rejected

May 11, 2009

Daily Education Headlines

LAUSD parents urged to demand more control of schools
Los Angeles Times, May 11
Risk-taking charter school operator Steve Barr is launching an effort through which parents would wrest political control of the L.A. school system from unions, school bureaucrats and other entrenched interests. The plan is for parents to form chapters all over town and improve schools using the growing leverage of the charter school movement.
More
School violence drops, but bullying, thefts persist
Washington Post, May 11
Even though spasms of intense violence erupt on campuses occasionally and linger in the social consciousness, violence at schools across the country has been decreasing for a number of years.
More

Texas district may give students week off for passing tests
Dallas Morning News, May 11
High school students in Mesquite, Texas who pass state assessments and their classes could skip the last week of school next year while their peers get intensive academic help under a plan expected to be approved by the school board.
More

Nevada district to eliminate administrative jobs to save $1.1 million
Las Vegas Sun, May 11
The Clark County school district expects to save $1.1 million a year from an administrative reorganization that shrinks five regional districts into four and eliminates another office.
More

California budget crisis threatens high school sports
San Francisco Chronicle, May 10
The state budget crisis has prompted school districts to contemplate painful cuts to sports programs–including the possibility of eliminating athletics entirely–and forced them into frenzied fund-raising.
More

Fertile N.Y.C. job market dries up overnight for new teachers
New York Times, May 10
As a result of efforts to cut costs and avoid teacher layoffs, New York City principals may only fill vacancies with internal candidates for the 2009-10 school year, leaving new graduates and aspiring teachers from programs like Teach for America and the city’s Teaching Fellows scrambling for jobs.
More

For more news, go to School Board News Today.

May 7, 2009

Daily education headlines

Obama offers D.C. voucher compromise
Washington Post, May 7
President Obama will propose setting aside enough money for all 1,716 students in the District’ of Columbia’s voucher program to continue receiving grants for private school tuition until they graduate from high school, but he would allow no new students to join the program, administration officials said.
More 

Indian-born school board candidate banking on Asian-American votes in Texas district
Dallas Morning News, May 7
An Indian-born candidate for the Plano, Texas, school board has traded the traditional path used to win such elections — candidate forums and endorsements from the city’s political elite — for a strategy nearly entirely dependent on the voter turnout of the city’s growing Asian-American population.
More

Calif. judge bars drug tests for students in band, chess club
Los Angeles Times, May 7
A Shasta County, Calif., Superior Court judge has temporarily barred a school district’s policy that subjects students in band and academic clubs to random drug tests.
More 

N.Y.C. schools chief bans hiring of teachers from outside
New York Times, May 6
Anticipating significant budget cuts to New York City schools in the coming year, Chancellor Joel I. Klein has ordered principals to stop hiring teachers from outside the system, a move that will force them to look internally at a pool that, according to an independent report, includes many subpar teachers.
More

Judge: Calif. teacher violated students’ rights by calling creationism ‘nonsense’
USA Today, May 6
A federal judge ruled that a public high school history teacher violated the First Amendment when he called creationism “superstitious nonsense” during a classroom lecture.
More

From School Board News Today

October 20, 2008

What does the research show about KIPP’s success?

In the interest of fairness and balance (you know, those pesky journalism credos), I tried mighty hard to find substantiated criticism of the KIPP school network, which I profiled for November’s American School Board Journal.

Short for the Knowledge is Power Program, KIPP, the national chain of high-performing charter schools, has been the darling of many education researchers and foundations for its ability to turn around some of the most challenging students in some of the most challenging neighborhoods in the U.S.

For instance, despite serving students who, on average, enter the KIPP system two grade levels behind, roughly two-thirds of KIPP fifth-graders outperformed their local counterparts in the reading and math portion of state exams in 2007. By the time those same KIPP fifth-graders got to eighth grade, 100 percent of them outperformed the local district.

How do they do it? It’s a question critics and admirers have wondered about ever since Mike Feinberg and Dave Levin, two fifth-grade teachers, launched the model in 1994 and then began to expand it in 2001. As a result, KIPP has become one of the most scrutinized school franchises in the country. The latest study came out last week and focuses on five KIPP schools in the San Francisco Bay Area.

(more…)

What does the research show about KIPP’s success?

In the interest of fairness and balance (you know, those pesky journalism credos), I tried mighty hard to find substantiated criticism of the KIPP school network, which I profiled for November’s American School Board Journal.

Short for the Knowledge is Power Program, KIPP, the national chain of high-performing charter schools, has been the darling of many education researchers and foundations for its ability to turn around some of the most challenging students in some of the most challenging neighborhoods in the U.S.

For instance, despite serving students who, on average, enter the KIPP system two grade levels behind, roughly two-thirds of KIPP fifth-graders outperformed their local counterparts in the reading and math portion of state exams in 2007. By the time those same KIPP fifth-graders got to eighth grade, 100 percent of them outperformed the local district.

How do they do it? It’s a question critics and admirers have wondered about ever since Mike Feinberg and Dave Levin, two fifth-grade teachers, launched the model in 1994 and then began to expand it in 2001. As a result, KIPP has become one of the most scrutinized school franchises in the country. The latest study came out last week and focuses on five KIPP schools in the San Francisco Bay Area.

(more…)

September 22, 2008

Some Charter Success Due to Authoritarian Approach

About a month ago, I drove into Baltimore to visit the KIPP Ujima school. If you’ve never heard of the Knowledge is Power Program, it’s a national network of charter schools located mostly in urban areas and serving primarily middle school students, though that focus is expanding.

Despite setting up shop in some of the most under-resourced communities and working with some of the most challenging students, the KIPP model has been successful where traditional public schools have not. In fact, in Baltimore, KIPP Ujima (which is named after the Kwanzaa principle of collective work and responsibility) is the highest performing public middle school in the city.

My visit, as part of an upcoming ASBJ feature, was to figure out why this was. Of course, before driving there I’d done some research and had formed some theories. I knew that the KIPP model (high expectations, results-driven, autonomy at the ground level) rested heavily on the addition of time.

KIPP kids log work days, spending on average nine-plus hours a day in school; with their teachers no doubt logging even more time than that. The extra time, I kept pressuring KIPP officials to admit, was the main reason for the better academic results.

But when I arrived at KIPP Ujima, I realized it was, as they had insisted, more than that. Though the school served fifth through eighth-grade students, I heard hardly a peep as I toured the school. The students silently walked down the hallway in single-file fashion. I learned later that the uniforms the students wore were given to them only after they had earned them, and could be taken away for any number of infractions, which included things, of course, like cheating or talking back, but also not being attentive enough in class.

It was a very different kind of learning environment at KIPP Ujima and I frankly marveled at how the staff had been able to convince all of the students to behave in this manner.

The current issue of Education Next provides some insight. In “Appeal to Authority” writer David Whitman takes a look into the reemergence and success of paternalism in urban schools, and cites the KIPP academy as an adopter of this role.

Naomi Dillon, Senior Editor

May 1, 2008

War stories from the District of Columbia schools

Educators and journalists love a good “war story,” and Michelle Rhee, chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools, did not disappoint. She spoke with reporters and writers at the annual conference of the Education Writers Association in Chicago last week.

One war story involved the all-too-common failure of the D.C. schools to put textbooks in the hands of students at the beginning of the school year. Last fall, Rhee made headlines by touring the school system’s book warehouse with D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty and finding pallet after pallet of untouched textbooks waiting for delivery.

Highlighting the problem didn’t prevent some foul-ups last fall in getting books to kids, and Rhee shared one shared one little-known incident.

A parent complained by e-mail that high school textbooks had ended up at a nearby middle school. That was bad enough, of course, but making it worse was that the central office had rejected the offer of parents to load up the books in their cars and personally deliver them to where they belonged.

The reasoning of bureaucrats? District rules insist that the textbooks be delivered by the school system. So the textbooks had to sit at the middle school until district personnel picked them up. Then they’d be sent back to the warehouse, processed, and eventually delivered to the right school.

That mentality, Rhee said, revealed the dysfunction within the district bureaucracy. She told the parents “to go ahead, so that kids had their books on the first day of school.”

The 38-year-old chancellor, who had never served as a school administrator before now, also shared a war story about one of her biggest political fights—closing 23 underutilized schools.

Rhee wasn’t surprised that school closings would be controversial. Nor did she doubt that the decision was correct. With nearly one-third of the city’s school-aged children in charter schools, the D.C. system had many schools filled to only half capacity—and they were wasting vast sums in salaries, energy costs, and security and maintenance resources.

What was interesting, though, was how strongly neighborhoods identified with their schools—without regard to their academic performance, she said.

During one school visit, Rhee said, she stopped to talk to residents on the street, and they all begged her to save their school building from closure. They loved the school, she said. They thought it was a great school.

The only problem, she noted, was that it was anything but a great school. “Only 9 percent of the kids were testing proficient.” That compared to a charter school only a few blocks away—serving students from the same neighborhood—that boasted that 90 percent of its students were scoring proficient.

For all the controversy involved, closing those schools was an early success for Rhee. So much money will be saved that each city school next year will have an art teacher, a music teacher, and a physical education teacher.

That might not seem all that remarkable for educators in more affluent communities, she added, but in D.C., such staffing is “almost unheard of.”

Finally, Rhee spoke a little about the City Council granting her unprecedented authority to terminate district employees, which she promptly used to cut 100 jobs in the central office. As it turned out, it wasn’t all that difficult to decide who should stay—and who should go.

For example, she recalled, she found a staff of nine serving teen mothers at a cost of $1 million annually. But the program only served about seven students each day, and it turned out that $700,000 of the program was spent on salaries.

That just didn’t cut it in Rhee’s judgment. “How do we make sure dollars actually have an impact on kids in the classrooms?” she asked. “We have to look at every program. Even if the people are nice people, if the program is not having a dollar-for-dollar real impact on kids, it has to be seriously looked at.”

These are only a few of Rhee’s stories. But they all emphasize how the new chancellor is fighting “the good fight” on behalf of D.C. schoolchildren. Such a fight ensures that we can expect Rhee to share even more war stories to share in the years ahead.

Del Stover, Senior Editor

January 30, 2008

Bush should fix NCLB and his legacy

When I was once a reporter covering the White House during the Clinton years, someone told me, “When the going gets tough, Clinton visits a school.”

Sure enough, he dropped by school after school during the Monica Lewinsky and ensuing impeachment scandals, sometimes proposing a new program, sometimes hawking one of his many initiatives, sometimes just touting public education. Those visits were a temporary distraction from the bad news—somehow, being in a school made everyone feel better.

I thought of Clinton’s woes when President Bush actually mentioned education in the first 15 minutes of the State of the Union this week. Many analysts believe Bush’s speech brought up past victories such as No Child Left Behind in hopes of deflecting attention from his dismal approval ratings and desperate attempts to stay relevant in his last year of office.

“Six years ago, we came together to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, and today no one can deny its results,” he said to applause mainly on the GOP side.

Problem is, if Bush tries to take that message to public schools, he might hear from the many school administrators who want the law changed, or scrapped entirely. Sen. Ted Kennedy, a top supporter of NCLB when it first passed, appeared to wince at his words. (And in another irony, Bush also touted the D.C. voucher program and called for more vouchers for students in failing schools, even though D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee was a guest of honor of First Lady Laura Bush.)

But even if Bush had to bear a few critics, wouldn’t it be better to fix the law now and leave office with a significant accomplishment? Since most Democrats in Congress want to hold off on the reauthorization, my completely unsolicited advice to the president would be to take a cue from his predecessor and stage some school visits, talk to folks there, and push hard for changes this year. There’s still time to build a better legacy, at least in the eyes of school officials.

Joetta Sack-Min, Associate Editor

January 24, 2008

Did Utah’s failed voucher plan spell the end of Republican rule?

The move to create publicly funded vouchers in Utah got shot down by voters last fall, but the political ramifications within the state may still be playing out in some very interesting ways.

Two Republicans are now running as Democrats for the state legislature in Utah County, the state’s second-most populous area just south of Salt Lake City. It’s also considered one of the most solidly Republican areas in one of the reddest states in the country. In a typical election, any Democrat who dares to run gets slaughtered, but this year they might be more competitive.

What’s going on out there?

Paul Rolly, a columnist for the Salt Lake Tribune, believes those two candidates might be part of a sea change in Utah politics related to the GOP-backed voucher legislation, which narrowly passed the state legislature but became a ballot referendum that was rejected by voters.

In a recent column, Rolly points to Steve Baugh, a former superintendent of the Alpine school district, who was registered as a Republican but is now running as a Democrat against Rep. Steve Sandstrom. Apparently, Baugh supported Sandstrom in the last cycle because he ran as an anti-voucher candidate against a man who had profited from a charter-school enterprise, but Sandstrom later voted in favor of the voucher legislation, which passed the House by one vote.

Then there’s Gwyn Franson, a city council member and Republican-turned-Democrat who Rolly says cited the voucher legislation as one piece of evidence in her argument that the GOP party has simply lost touch with the desires of its constituents. And there are likely other prominent Democrats that will run for the legislature this year, Rolly says.

Even if they win, does it really add up to a sea change for state politics? “If so, chalk it up to last year’s tsunami over private school vouchers,” Rolly writes, but cautions, “whether it turns out to be a ripple or a flood remains to be seen.”

Yet another sideshow to watch in this wacky political year…

Joetta Sack-Min, Associate Editor

Older Posts »